Externalities of Self vs Reality in Relation to C.S. Lewis - Christian Callaghan
In this passage, C.S. Lewis responds to a critique from his friend Corineus, who suggests that contemporary Christianity has lost its essence. Corineus argues that what exists today is a mere shadow of historic Christianity, retaining its language, traditions, and sentiments, but abandoning the core doctrines that once defined it. He likens this shift to the English monarchy, where ceremonial aspects endure, yet genuine authority has faded. While Lewis fundamentally disagrees with this assertion, he briefly accepts it for the sake of discussion. He then poses a challenge: if the foundational beliefs have truly disappeared, why have the external practices of Christianity endured so resiliently over the centuries?
Much like how C.S. depicts here that the Christian religion has changed and that it is only an externality or front of what it is meant to be we too are shells of who we are too many. We display different personalities around different people whether that be for bosses or friends and even lovers. We have deferring personas in different environments. Does that mean we are no longer who we say we are... no. Simply because we make augmentation in our style of discussion does not mean we are entirely different people. I apply this same theory to Christianity today and I disagree with Corineus as well.
Comments
Post a Comment